Call it an accident of geography; call it the 'darker side' of Russian history---either way, when the former are combined with a leadership that is determined to take the world back to the very worst tensions of the Cold War era, then we have the makings of extreme danger, for Ukraine and the wider region.
Russia has been attacked many times in the past, sometimes vain the plains of Ukraine; it has signed 'agreements,' that have either been turned upside down by other parties (Nazi Germany) and now by the Russians themselves.
Russia has historically controlled the Crimea and it has also had designs on the Baltic states, and in that sense by travelling less violent methods of achieving its goals, perhaps nit would have garnered a level of international support on the world stage. That Russia/The Soviet Union, has always had a strong interest in this 'border area' or in its words, 'outer Russia,' is well accepted, but what Putin and his tame Duma have approved today, is capable of taking the world to the brink of the very worst of the Cold War days.
Russia has a strong sense of grievance, one not well understood in the West, and it will not easily respond to calls from the UE or the UN to step back from the chasm that it now teeters so very close to.
The USA may speak out, but militarily it would be most unwise to ramp up the tension beyond that Obama has already indicated. It may pressure the EU to take a stronger stance, but no one in the West wants to go down a journey that would undo so much of what has been achieved since WW2. Russia knows this. Putin is playing with the sensibilities of the West. If he does step back, expect some pretty nasty economic hits, via his control of the gas lines that feed Western Europe.
That too is a dangerous game; it will feed into efforts by the said countries to develop their own alternate arrangements, re 'green fuels. Perhaps that is not a bad thing.
Russia has always had strong/controlling, bordering on the megalomaniac leaders. Once in power they massage the rule of law in order to maintain it. They use their national media (RT) to appear to be a voice of reason, but if any 'independent' speaks out,' then reporters 'disappear, get killed or the news outlets are closed down. So much for freedom of expression in Russia. (The only freedom that exists is that which is sanctioned by the State and which criticises events outside of Russia--RT makes for 'interesting' viewing).
Events are rolling out as I write this blog. It is possible that things will change so quickly as to make this blog well and truly out of date.
Let us all hope that a modicum of rationality will prevail in this unfortunate journey of the
'New Russia.'
www.authorneilcoleman.com
Russia has been attacked many times in the past, sometimes vain the plains of Ukraine; it has signed 'agreements,' that have either been turned upside down by other parties (Nazi Germany) and now by the Russians themselves.
Russia has historically controlled the Crimea and it has also had designs on the Baltic states, and in that sense by travelling less violent methods of achieving its goals, perhaps nit would have garnered a level of international support on the world stage. That Russia/The Soviet Union, has always had a strong interest in this 'border area' or in its words, 'outer Russia,' is well accepted, but what Putin and his tame Duma have approved today, is capable of taking the world to the brink of the very worst of the Cold War days.
Russia has a strong sense of grievance, one not well understood in the West, and it will not easily respond to calls from the UE or the UN to step back from the chasm that it now teeters so very close to.
The USA may speak out, but militarily it would be most unwise to ramp up the tension beyond that Obama has already indicated. It may pressure the EU to take a stronger stance, but no one in the West wants to go down a journey that would undo so much of what has been achieved since WW2. Russia knows this. Putin is playing with the sensibilities of the West. If he does step back, expect some pretty nasty economic hits, via his control of the gas lines that feed Western Europe.
That too is a dangerous game; it will feed into efforts by the said countries to develop their own alternate arrangements, re 'green fuels. Perhaps that is not a bad thing.
Russia has always had strong/controlling, bordering on the megalomaniac leaders. Once in power they massage the rule of law in order to maintain it. They use their national media (RT) to appear to be a voice of reason, but if any 'independent' speaks out,' then reporters 'disappear, get killed or the news outlets are closed down. So much for freedom of expression in Russia. (The only freedom that exists is that which is sanctioned by the State and which criticises events outside of Russia--RT makes for 'interesting' viewing).
Events are rolling out as I write this blog. It is possible that things will change so quickly as to make this blog well and truly out of date.
Let us all hope that a modicum of rationality will prevail in this unfortunate journey of the
'New Russia.'
www.authorneilcoleman.com
No comments:
Post a Comment